Implant Veterans of Toxic Exposure

Ultra Sound and Breast Implants

Home
Action
Alerts
Hayes
Congressional Report
AMT-1
AMT Audit
Fly-In
ASPRS Survey
Bell & Pointer
BI Capsules
BI Chemicals
BI Numbers - Dow
Burson-Marsteller
B-M's Spokesdoctors
Dr. Pierre Blais
Burson - NEW
Cab-O-Sil
CANDO
Capsules
Chemical Adverse
ChemBMS
Children
Chem Soup
Connie Chung
CRS_safety
Dowknew1
Dowknew2
Dowknew3
Dowknew4
Dow Bleed
Dow Disease
Dow Fraud
Dow Migration
Dow Rupture
DC Whines
Dr. Anderson
Explant
Gagged
Gel Reaction
Griffin Bell
Hancock
Harvard-Brigham
HAD
Inflammation
Jenny
Judge Jones Transcript
Kessler
Latissimus
Maryland Informed
McKennon
McGhan-Shells
Poem to Congress
No Evidence
Cole
Norman Cole
Notable People
Scleroderma
SS
Study-Adjuvant
Study-Adjuvant-FDA
Study-Beagle
Study-Dogs
Study NY
Study-Tissue Reaction
Talcott
Testimony
Ultra Sound
Links

Another truth hidden under the rug 

Taken from Evidentiary CD 1002
 
This document may be ordered from the National Breast Implant Repository.

DCCKKA038718

J. E. Jenkins, D. C.
9333 Blue Ridge
Kansas City, MO 64138
Telephone:    761-0066

 

April 6, 1982

Subjecting a prosthesis to ultra sound {RICK MAR IV U.S. FREQUENCY 1 M  HZ—field distribution plane calibrated acoustic power output 0-20 WAVE FORM I C W OR C W crystal size  10 square centimeter area} and utilizing 10 watts of power for 7 minutes

Result:

Within the 7 minute application it appeared a discoloration had found at the site. Under a 4x microscope this discoloration was found to be approximately 500 minute air bubbles.  There was also a temperature rise of from room temperature of 76 degrees to 94 degrees on the surface of the prosthesis.

In subsequent applications of U.S. the exact results were obtained.  The bubbles dissipated in each prosthesis after approximately 6 to 20 hours with no visible residual. {U.S. being ultra sound)

In subjecting the prosthesis to diathermy {Mettler-Shortwave diathermy 27.32 MHZ output} a magnifying glass effect was noted.

The surface of the prosthesis was not sufficient to bring the diathermy up to power. I held the prosthesis in my hand with only 3 to 5 units {calibrated from 0 to 100} of power, almost an instant burning of my hand occurred.  There was no actual burning to my hand as reflexes caused me to drop the prosthesis immediately.

Conclusions:

Ultra sound and diathermy are definitely not recommended by these experiments.

In practical application of D.M.S.O and aspirin on one patient’s reddening of the tissue at the site of application was noted with no reduction of pain.

Not conclusive as far as experimentation was concerned.

Site maintained by Pamela G. Dowd